Dear Shirley: On the Subject of Media Coverage of Boston 2024

[An open letter to Globe columnist Shirley Leung, in the spirit of her recent open letter to Red Sox Executive Larry Lucchino.]

Dear Shirley:

Just read your open letter to Larry Lucchino, in which you implore him to save the city’s Olympic bid.

It’s clear you think pretty highly of the guy — his “storied career,” his “outsized role” in the Sox turnaround, his “discerning eyes,” etc. Heck, in your view of things, Larry Lucchino can build stadiums that “transform entire sections of cities and make people realize we can be better than we are.”

As you argue, Larry accomplished this very thing in San Diego, getting voters to approve a referendum to build a stadium for the Padres. The stadium, in turn, was to be the cornerstone of a bigger redevelopment project.

But here’s some more about that stadium and that redevelopment project that your open letter didn’t include. Back in 1998, at the urging of San Diego’s mayor and the redevelopment team (of which Lucchino was a part), the voters of San Diego voted to contribute $275 million to the project in the form of bonds. The beauty part for the San Diego electorate was that the bonds would be paid off by the property taxes that the project would create. A free lunch, as it were.

Sadly, but not surprisingly, something happened to that free lunch along the way. A California-wide budget crisis in 2011 led to a new state law that intercepted the property taxes that the city was counting on to pay off the bonds. When the city asked to be exempted from the new law, the state said “no.” Now the whole thing is in litigation and the city may well be on the hook for the money it ponied up in reliance on what may have turned out to have been a broken promise. You can read more about it here and here.

So, here’s to recognizing what, as you said, Larry Lucchino knows: God is in the details. All of them.

2 thoughts on “Dear Shirley: On the Subject of Media Coverage of Boston 2024

  1. The presumption of influence is an interesting phenomenon. I would argue that these old media things have taken a hit for how influential they are over the past 5 years and only have more decline on the menu.

    The new game of these swells seems to be to fly so low under the radar that they are scraping tree tops and hope proxies in a paper that has shrunk down to the status of a sports moguls hobby toy will somehow sell the thing.

    That’s when you know they are doomed. Any attempt to sell the thing using normal persuasion levers is instantly met with a minor avalanche of derision and hostility. But you can’t very well use that as your long term game plan.

    Leung is a whimper that this thing is going out with. There will be no bang.

  2. Pingback: #NoBoston2024 Daily News Roundup – May 3, 2015 | NoBoston2024

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s